Table of Trademark Cases
Mastering the Law of TrademarksVarious Canadian trademark cases are cited on this website. The citations for these cases have been compiled into a list below. Each citation in the list is followed by the trademark at issue in a given case. Click on the citations for more information about the trademark at issue.
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - Acquired distinctiveness
Home Juice Co v Orange Maison Ltée, [1970] SCR 942 (ORANGE MAISON) |
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - Character or quality
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - Conditions of production
Staffordshire Potteries Ltd v Canada (Registrar of Trade Marks), [1976] FCJ No 201, 26 CPR (2d) 134 (FCTD) (KILNCRAFT) |
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - Persons employed in production
Canadian Council of Professional Engineers v Lubrication Engineers Inc, [1992] 2 FC 329 (FCA) (LUBRICATION ENGINEERS) |
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - Place of origin
MC Imports Inc v AFOD Ltd, 2016 FCA 60 (LINGAYEN) |
Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v Maple Leaf Meats Inc, [2001] 2 FC 536, aff'd 2002 FCA 169 (PARMA) |
Clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive - When sounded
Confusing with another trademark
Falsely suggests a connection
Name of a good or service
Name or surname of an individual - Acquired distinctiveness
Miranda Aluminum Inc v Miranda Windows & Doors Inc, 2010 FCA 104 (MIRANDA) |
Name or surname of an individual - Living or recently deceased
Name or surname of an individual - Primarily merely
The material made available on this website does not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. Always obtain legal advice promptly in deciding an appropriate course of action for your particular situation.